Re: I'd be PLENTY happy with this!!!


Just below the shoulders, no matter how thick, silky, elegantly moving, and beautiful, is just not long enough for me.


The first real and clear awareness of my fetish hit me when as a teenager I spotted Jane Seymour´s tailbone-length sleek mane as the then-current Bond girl, and a few years later again when I saw Debra Jo Fondren in a Playboy issue that a friend had "borrowed" from his father.


For me, "long" means that the portion of hair below the woman´s shoulders is clearly longer than that above. That´s when I begin to get interested.


For me, that beautiful lady in this post has only just started the journey towards long hair. She has wonderful potential, but not really long hair (for me) yet.


I realize, acknowledge, and welcome the amazing variety of tastes, priorities, and definitions existing even within the focus of this forum that seems so clear and simple at first sight ("long hair"); I just wanted to make my point here so that it´s being heard, too.